MemCast
MemCast / episode / insight
#evm2#hyperliquid2#marketing‑strategy5
Hyperliquid EVM may be redundant given core product capabilities
  • Core exchange can natively support financial primitives like lending
  • EVM adds unnecessary complexity for most use cases
  • Risks diverting attention from higher-impact exchange improvements
  • Team's small size better focused on core product
CedusEmpire00:23:46

Supporting quotes

Quote
00:23:46
“Hyperlid you could build the money market right into Hyperlid per exchange, right? Um you don't need the Hyper you don't need like lending markets on Hyper EVM, right? it it it's kind of like redundant” — Cedus

From this concept

Hyperliquid EVM Debate

Contrasting views on Hyperliquid's EVM strategy, weighing the benefits of ecosystem development against potential distraction from core exchange functionality.

View full episode →

Similar insights

“Marble ingests multimodal inputs and produces editable 3‑D worlds”

Fei-Fei LiLatent Space

“Product focus balances immediate utility with long‑term world‑model ambition”

Fei-Fei LiLatent Space

“Real‑time demos showcase feasibility despite latency, proving concept”

Fei-Fei LiLatent Space