Balaji Srinivasan: The COLLAPSE of the West – Why AI, Bitcoin & China Will Win | Peter McCormack
Balaji maps a rapid eastward shift in global power, the rise of China and the internet, the unsustainability of the US dollar empire, and why Bitcoin and network‑states may become the new foundations of civilization.
2h 18m·Guest Balaji Srinivasan·Host Peter McCormack·
The Global Economic Center Shifts Eastward
Balaji shows how the world's economic mass, once centered in Eurasia, moved West during the industrial revolution and is now racing back to Asia in a matter of decades, reshaping the balance of power.
For millennia the world’s economic mass sat in Eurasia, but the industrial revolution moved it West and now it’s sprinting back to Asia.
- The GDP‑geocenter graph shows that for thousands of years the global economy’s center of mass was essentially in Eurasia.
- The industrial revolution pushed the center to Europe and the United States, creating a Western dominance that lasted about a century.
- Since the 1990s, China and India have reclaimed that central position, compressing centuries of economic change into a few decades.
- This rapid rebalancing means institutions built for a West‑centric world are losing relevance.
- The shift is measurable in real‑time GDP data and will continue to accelerate as Asian economies scale.
Quote
00:02:08“For thousands of years the global economy's center of economic mass was essentially in Eurasia.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:04:10“This took hundreds of years and this happened in tens of years.” — Balaji Srinivasan
China and India have reclaimed their historic share of world GDP, driving a rapid rebalancing.
- A 2,000‑year economic history chart shows India and China dominating the world economy before the West’s rise.
- Since the early 2000s, the share of global GDP held by the G7 has been falling while BRICS nations, especially China and India, have surged.
- The data reveals a clear inversion: the G7’s percentage of world output is sliding, whereas BRICS is climbing.
- This shift is not a temporary blip; it reflects structural changes in production, demographics, and technology.
- The implication is that future growth, capital, and influence will increasingly flow through Asian economies.
Quote
00:06:46“India and China were basically most of the world economy back around the time.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:07:57“The G7 nations have just been declining in their GDP percentage of the world and BRICS has been rising.” — Balaji Srinivasan
The G7’s share of world GDP is eroding while BRICS is rising, signalling a structural shift.
- Historical data shows the G7’s GDP share falling from around 45 % a few decades ago to under 15 % today.
- BRICS nations have moved from a negligible share to roughly a third of global output.
- This transition is happening faster than any previous economic re‑centering, driven by technology, demographics, and capital flows.
- The shift challenges the political and strategic assumptions of Western policymakers.
- It also creates new opportunities for investors who position themselves in the rising economies.
Quote
00:07:57“The G7 nations have just been declining in their GDP percentage of the world and BRICS has been rising.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:08:23“The flipping has happened, most of the world economy is shifting rapidly.” — Balaji Srinivasan
The Post-War Institutional Order Is Obsolete
Balaji argues that institutions forged after 1950--UN, World Bank, the whole post-war order--were built on a Western-centric economic base that has now evaporated, making them increasingly irrelevant.
Institutions created after 1950 are losing relevance because the economic power base has moved.
- The UN, World Bank, IMF, and similar bodies were designed when the West held the lion’s share of global wealth.
- As the economic center shifts east, these institutions lack the financial clout and legitimacy to shape outcomes.
- Their mandates, funding, and decision‑making processes still reflect a 1950s worldview, creating a mismatch with today’s reality.
- This misalignment erodes their effectiveness and fuels calls for new, regionally‑balanced structures.
- The decline of the post‑war order is evident in the diminishing influence of Western powers in global forums.
Quote
00:04:31“The post‑war order is obsolete because the money isn't there.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:04:44“The world is actually reverting back to what it looked like before 1950.” — Balaji Srinivasan
MAGA and Build‑Back‑Better narratives cling to a 1950‑era baseline that no longer exists.
- The MAGA movement idealizes the 1950s as a golden age of prosperity, ignoring the massive shift in economic geography.
- Build‑Back‑Better assumes the post‑war order as a starting point, but the underlying financial foundations have moved to Asia.
- This nostalgia fuels political friction, as people resist the reality of declining Western living standards.
- The disconnect between cultural memory and economic data creates policy paralysis.
- Recognizing the outdated baseline is essential for realistic planning.
Quote
00:05:00“The MAGA movement thinks 1950 is the way things are supposed to be.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:05:06“They want to see escapism and superhero movies.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Relative decline of the West isn’t catastrophic, but absolute decline threatens living standards.
- Western economies are shrinking in relative share, but many firms (e.g., IBM, Microsoft) remain profitable, showing that relative decline can coexist with absolute health.
- The real danger lies in an absolute drop in output, which would erode wages, jobs, and public services.
- Without absolute growth, the West cannot sustain its social contract, leading to political instability.
- The shift from relative to absolute decline is driven by loss of manufacturing, innovation, and financial leverage.
- Policymakers must focus on preserving absolute output, not just market share.
Quote
00:06:01“Declining in relative terms... not necessarily the end of the world.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:06:28“It's a rebalancing.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Four-Party Conflict: Red America, Blue America, China, Internet
Balaji reframes US politics as two internal factions (Red vs. Blue) each fighting external forces--China and the Internet--creating a four-way geopolitical struggle that reshapes policy and economics.
US politics has split into Red America vs. Blue America, each battling an external opponent.
- Red America (the traditional Republican base) is locked in a trade war with China, focusing on manufacturing and military competition.
- Blue America (the Democratic/establishment side) is fighting the Internet, which threatens its media, advertising, and cultural dominance.
- The two internal factions also clash with each other, creating a three‑way domestic conflict.
- This four‑party dynamic explains why policy swings are so extreme and contradictory.
- Understanding this framework helps predict future alignments and strategic moves.
Quote
00:18:15“Red America versus China is a trade war. Blue America versus the internet is a tech lash.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:20:15“Red America vs Blue America is Trump. Blue America vs Red America is wokeness.” — Balaji Srinivasan
The Internet is disrupting Blue America’s media and money while China is overtaking Red America’s manufacturing and military.
- AI and crypto, driven by the Internet, are eroding traditional media revenue and the financial model of Blue America.
- China’s massive investment in robotics and drones gives it a decisive advantage in manufacturing and defense, effectively winning the war of parts.
- Both forces are accelerating at similar speeds, creating a simultaneous pressure on the two domestic factions.
- The result is a loss of control for the US over both its cultural narrative and its industrial base.
- Policy responses that ignore either front are doomed to fail.
Quote
00:20:46“The internet is doing AI and crypto, which are going to take over all media and all money. China is doing robots and drones, so they're going to take over all manufacturing and all military.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:21:11“China has already won the war. You can't fight a war with China because they make all the parts.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Economic decline fuels cultural backlash: Blue America turns woke, Red America feels threatened and seeks territorial expansion.
- As Blue America’s resources shrink, it reacts with cultural wokeness, trying to protect its identity through social movements.
- Red America, perceiving a loss of global dominance, pushes for expansionist rhetoric and trade wars to reclaim status.
- Both sides blame each other and external forces, deepening polarization and preventing coordinated policy.
- This feedback loop accelerates the overall decline of Western influence.
- Recognizing the economic root of the cultural battles is key to de‑escalation.
Quote
00:21:57“The loss of economic status led Blue America to go woke and then push the tech lash wokeness.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:22:31“Red America feels under assault and wants to expand its territory again.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Bitcoin as the Core of a New Monetary System
Balaji describes Bitcoin's meteoric rise as a de-valuation of the dollar, a 'super-inflation', and argues that all contracts, assets and even sovereign law will migrate onto the blockchain.
Bitcoin’s 100‑million‑fold price increase represents a 10.41 % monthly de‑valuation of the dollar – a form of super‑inflation.
- In 2009 Bitcoin traded at 0.1 ¢ per dollar; today it is around $100 k, a 100 million‑fold rise.
- Compounded over 16 years this equals roughly a 10.41 % monthly de‑valuation of the dollar versus Bitcoin.
- Balaji calls this “super‑inflation” and argues it is already happening, not a future scenario.
- The phenomenon shows how fiat money can lose value dramatically while a scarce digital asset appreciates.
- Investors and savers should view Bitcoin as a hedge against this ongoing de‑valuation.
Quote
00:08:45“Bitcoin was 0.1 cent per dollar in 2009, now $100,000, 100 millionx devaluation, 10.41% monthly.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:09:00“Superinflation is already here, it's called Bitcoinization.” — Balaji Srinivasan
All financial contracts can move on‑chain; Bitcoin becomes the backbone of future finance.
- Stocks, bonds, and even legal contracts can be tokenized and settled on blockchain, removing intermediaries.
- Smart contracts enable trust‑less enforcement, reducing reliance on fragile institutions like Delaware courts.
- The migration of money to crypto mirrors the earlier shift of media to the Internet, creating a new, decentralized financial layer.
- This on‑chain future makes the system more transparent, programmable, and resistant to censorship.
- Bitcoin’s scarcity and security make it the natural anchor for this new financial architecture.
Quote
00:21:14“All stock, all bond, all of that goes on chain. Bitcoin is the core of that.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:21:28“Blue America has Delaware and it's melting down. Smart contracts can be contract law on chain.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Bitcoin creates a sovereign collective that transcends nation‑states, imposing law above the state.
- Bitcoin’s protocol is immutable and enforced by cryptography, limiting any government’s ability to override it.
- This creates a “government of governments” where the code itself is the highest authority, similar to law above state.
- The network provides a universal, permissionless layer for value transfer, identity, and contracts.
- By operating beyond borders, Bitcoin offers a global, neutral monetary system that can replace the dollar’s role.
- The shift to a sovereign collective could reshape geopolitics, reducing the power of traditional states.
Quote
01:00:01“Bitcoin is a government of governments, a smart contract that constrains even a king.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
01:00:11“It's a sovereign collective, law above state.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Dollar Inflation as Global Taxation and Its Unsustainability
Balaji explains how the US prints dollars to fund its lifestyle, effectively taxing the world, and why this model cannot survive a loss of reserve-currency status.
Dollar inflation functions as a global tax that funds American prosperity beyond its productive capacity.
- The US creates money out of thin air, distributing it worldwide through debt instruments, treasury bonds, and dollar‑denominated trade.
- This “global taxation” lets the US enjoy a standard of living far above what its domestic production would support.
- The system relies on other countries holding dollars and US treasuries, effectively paying for American consumption.
- As long as the dollar remains the world’s reserve currency, this arrangement persists.
- However, it creates a hidden tax on every nation that uses the dollar, eroding real wealth elsewhere.
Quote
00:45:00“Dollar inflation is global taxation, the US gets a huge cut for nothing.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:45:36“The world is being taxed to pay for American prosperity.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Losing the reserve‑currency status would cause a catastrophic drop in US living standards.
- If the dollar stops being the primary global reserve, the US would lose the ability to finance its deficits cheaply.
- Balaji estimates living standards could fall by 50‑99 % because the dollar’s purchasing power would collapse.
- The loss would also trigger a wave of de‑valuation for assets priced in dollars, destabilizing markets worldwide.
- The US’s reliance on dollar‑based debt makes this a high‑stakes gamble.
- Preventing this outcome requires either retaining the reserve status or transitioning to a new monetary system (e.g., Bitcoin).
Quote
00:49:28“If the dollar loses reserve status, living standards drop 50‑99%.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:49:58“The dollar is the only thing that keeps the US standard of living.” — Balaji Srinivasan
US debt and unfunded liabilities (~$175 trillion) are unsustainable, pointing toward a sovereign debt crisis.
- The US government’s total liabilities—including Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security—total roughly $175 trillion.
- This figure dwarfs the nation’s annual GDP and far exceeds any realistic ability to service it.
- Debt is not just money; it represents future obligations for healthcare, military, and pensions that cannot be printed.
- Without a credible plan to reduce or restructure these commitments, a hard default or hyper‑inflation becomes likely.
- The looming crisis adds urgency to the search for alternative monetary foundations like Bitcoin.
Quote
01:05:21“$175 trillion unfunded liabilities, debt unsustainable.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
01:05:55“Debt is commitments, not money, cannot be printed.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Tariffs and Industrial Policy Are Ineffective Without Supply-Chain Insight
Balaji critiques tariffs as blunt, instant taxes that destroy margins, and proposes data-driven industrial policy that maps supply chains to build domestic capacity.
Tariffs act as instant taxes that destroy margins without building domestic capacity.
- A tariff is levied at the port, forcing importers to pay a large tax immediately, unlike a gradual tax that can be spread over time.
- High tariffs (e.g., 49 %) can wipe out thin‑margin businesses, forcing emergency loans or shutdowns.
- The policy does not develop domestic suppliers; it merely shifts costs to consumers and erodes competitiveness.
- Historical examples (e.g., US steel tariffs) show limited success and significant collateral damage.
- Effective industrial strategy must go beyond tariffs to address the underlying supply‑chain structure.
Quote
00:29:47“Tariffs are instant taxes that destroy margins.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:30:07“Tariffs don't build domestic capacity.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Rational industrial policy requires detailed mapping of supply chains to identify critical upstream suppliers.
- By analyzing tax returns, customs data, and supplier relationships, a government can pinpoint which foreign components are essential.
- Once identified, the state can incentivize domestic production of those critical parts, reducing dependence on hostile suppliers.
- This approach is far more precise than blanket tariffs, targeting the true bottlenecks in the supply chain.
- It also enables coordinated investment, workforce training, and technology transfer for the identified sectors.
- Balaji cites examples where such mapping could have prevented supply‑chain shocks during the pandemic.
Quote
00:24:24“Rational industrial policy would map supply chain, identify critical suppliers.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:24:49“Crowdfunding domestic vendors among foreign customers.” — Balaji Srinivasan
A group of foreign buyers can collectively fund a domestic supplier, creating a homegrown supply chain.
- Ten overseas customers can pool resources to finance a U.S. supplier, effectively “crowdfunding” domestic production.
- This reduces reliance on a single foreign source and aligns incentives across the buyer network.
- The model turns a fragmented demand into a coordinated investment, fostering resilience.
- It also sidesteps the need for large government subsidies, leveraging market forces.
- Balaji suggests this could be a blueprint for rebuilding critical industries like semiconductors.
Quote
00:27:18“Group of 10 customers can crowdfund a domestic vendor.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:27:37“Taxing 10 guys stops them buying foreign.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Australia and New Zealand: Under-Recognized Winners
Balaji highlights how Australia and New Zealand benefit from mining exports to China, superior debt metrics, and a strategic time-zone position, making them resilient in the shifting global order.
Australia’s mining exports to China sustain blue‑collar jobs, unlike the US de‑industrialization.
- Australia ships large volumes of iron ore and coal to China, keeping its mining sector robust.
- This creates stable, well‑paid blue‑collar employment, contrasting sharply with US job losses in manufacturing.
- The demand from China also supports ancillary services and regional development.
- The symbiotic relationship boosts Australia’s trade surplus and fiscal health.
- Balaji argues this makes Australia a model of “red‑collar” prosperity linked to Chinese demand.
Quote
00:11:02“Australia's mining exports to China keep blue‑collar jobs.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:11:24“Red collar in Australia rises with China.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Australia and New Zealand have superior debt‑to‑GDP ratios and a strategic Asia time‑zone advantage.
- Both countries maintain debt‑to‑GDP ratios lower than most G7 members, giving them fiscal flexibility.
- Their location in the Asia‑Pacific time zone aligns business hours with China, Japan, and Southeast Asia, facilitating real‑time trade.
- The “air‑gap” of 12 hours from the US reduces exposure to American economic shocks.
- These factors attract capital and talent seeking stability and proximity to growth markets.
- Balaji sees them as undervalued safe havens in a volatile global environment.
Quote
00:11:44“Australia has the best debt‑to‑GDP ratio, better than the G7.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:12:02“12‑hour air gap makes Australia more attuned to the Asia time zone.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Millionaire migration data shows Australia gaining high‑net‑worth individuals while the UK loses them.
- Recent charts indicate Australia’s net‑worth millionaire inflow outpaces the UK’s outflow.
- The EMA financial centre has shifted from London to Dubai, reflecting the broader eastward move of capital.
- This trend underscores the attractiveness of Australian lifestyle, tax environment, and proximity to Asian markets.
- The influx of wealthy migrants brings capital, entrepreneurship, and demand for high‑value services.
- In contrast, the UK’s loss of millionaires signals a weakening of its financial magnetism.
Quote
00:12:28“Australia gaining millionaires while the UK is losing them.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:12:48“EMA centre moved from London to Dubai.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Education Shifts to Internet-First Apprenticeships
Balaji envisions a future where learning is task-oriented, AI-assisted, and delivered online, replacing traditional K-12 schooling with skill-based apprenticeships.
Learning will become internet‑first, focusing on task‑based skill acquisition rather than age‑graded schooling.
- Students will complete real‑world tasks online, earning credentials tied to demonstrable abilities.
- The model mirrors historic apprenticeships, allowing rapid up‑skilling without lengthy formal schooling.
- AI tools can generate personalized problem sets, while human experts verify outputs, ensuring quality.
- This approach reduces costs, expands access, and aligns education directly with market needs.
- Balaji predicts a collapse of the traditional K‑12 system in favor of modular, competency‑based pathways.
Quote
01:59:01“Education will be internet‑first, tasks, apprenticeships.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
01:59:17“AI will assist, but human verification is needed.” — Balaji Srinivasan
AI outputs require human verification because AI is probabilistic and can make errors.
- Generative AI can produce plausible but incorrect legal, medical, or technical content.
- A human‑in‑the‑loop is essential to audit, correct, and certify AI‑generated results.
- This verification step creates new jobs focused on validation, quality control, and risk management.
- Over time, standards and tools will evolve to streamline the verification process.
- The model balances AI efficiency with human judgment to maintain safety and reliability.
Quote
01:39:37“AI makes errors, needs verification.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
01:40:03“Human loop needed for AI outputs.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Network schools combine community, talent recruitment, and education into a unified platform.
- The concept merges online learning with real‑world community building, allowing students to pick a “network state” as their school.
- Talent pipelines link education directly to employers, removing the gap between graduation and hiring.
- Geographic location becomes less relevant; participants join based on shared values and projects.
- This model also supports micro‑economies where learners earn crypto or token rewards for completed tasks.
- Balaji sees this as the next evolution of higher education, supplanting traditional universities.
Quote
02:02:06“Network schools combine community, talent recruitment, education.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
02:02:24“Pick your community, country, college as a unified path.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Network States: The Future of Governance
Balaji proposes that internet-first societies will form sovereign, crypto-backed network states that attract global talent and operate beyond traditional nation-state borders.
Internet‑first societies will evolve into sovereign network states powered by shared crypto infrastructure.
- A network state is a voluntary, digitally‑native community that self‑governs using blockchain‑based contracts.
- It provides its own identity, dispute resolution, and economic layer independent of any national jurisdiction.
- Crypto tokens serve as the native currency, enabling borderless trade and finance.
- These entities can negotiate with traditional states, offering services in exchange for recognition.
- Balaji believes this model will scale as the internet continues to erode geographic constraints.
Quote
01:54:31“Internet‑first societies will form network states.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
01:55:05“These rely on shared crypto infrastructure.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Network states attract global talent, bypassing traditional immigration barriers.
- By offering a digital passport and token‑based compensation, network states can recruit engineers, creators, and entrepreneurs from anywhere.
- Participants join based on shared values and projects rather than citizenship, creating a meritocratic ecosystem.
- This model sidesteps visa quotas, work permits, and residency requirements that constrain nation‑states.
- It also enables rapid scaling of teams across borders, fostering innovation clusters that are fluid and resilient.
- Balaji cites early experiments where talent pools are organized around crypto projects and online schools.
Quote
01:55:21“Network states attract global talent, bypass immigration.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
02:03:17“Unified talent recruitment across country, college, community.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Network states are capitalist, internet‑first, and deliberately unaffiliated with either China or the US.
- They adopt free‑market principles, using token economics to allocate resources.
- Their governance is coded, transparent, and can be upgraded via community vote.
- By staying neutral, they avoid the geopolitical tug‑of‑war between the Chinese state and the US.
- This neutrality makes them attractive to users seeking freedom from state censorship or economic coercion.
- Balaji envisions a pluralistic ecosystem of many such states co‑existing globally.
Quote
02:05:24“They are not aligned with the Chinese state nor the US state.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
02:05:09“Network states are capitalist, internet‑first.” — Balaji Srinivasan
The Collapse of the West Mirrors the USSR
Balaji draws a parallel between the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the current trajectory of Western decline, emphasizing ethnic fragmentation and the loss of economic primacy.
The fall of the USSR is the closest historical parallel to the imminent collapse of the West.
- Both events involve a superpower losing its ideological and economic grip on a large population.
- The USSR’s dissolution in 1991 followed a long period of economic stagnation and nationalist resurgence, similar to today’s Western trends.
- Balaji argues that the West’s relative decline mirrors the Soviet trajectory, with a rapid rebalancing toward Asia.
- The comparison highlights how a once‑dominant bloc can fragment into smaller, competing entities.
- Recognizing this pattern warns policymakers of the speed and inevitability of change.
Quote
00:01:07“The fall of the USSR is the closest parallel I think within our lifetimes to what is going to happen 2024‑2025 plus.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
01:41:41“USSR collapse similar to West's future.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Ethnic majorities will reassert themselves after the collapse of a multinational empire.
- In the USSR, ethnic groups like Estonians and Russians pushed for independence, reshaping borders.
- Balaji notes that after the Soviet breakup, Russia re‑established an ethnic majority within its reduced territory.
- A similar process could occur in the West as supranational identities weaken and nation‑state loyalties revive.
- This fragmentation may lead to new, smaller political entities aligned along cultural or ethnic lines.
- Understanding this dynamic is crucial for anticipating future geopolitical realignments.
Quote
01:42:20“Russia reestablished an ethnic majority after the USSR.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
01:42:00“Ethnic majorities will reassert after empire collapse.” — Balaji Srinivasan
The US’s reliance on the dollar as a global tax base makes its empire unsustainable, mirroring the Soviet economic overextension.
- The Soviet Union’s centrally planned economy eventually collapsed under fiscal strain, similar to how the US’s dollar‑based system is eroding.
- Dollar inflation acts as a hidden tax, funding American consumption while draining global resources.
- If the dollar loses its reserve status, the US will face a severe contraction in living standards, akin to the Soviet economic implosion.
- The historical parallel underscores how an empire built on external financial extraction can implode when the extraction mechanism fails.
- Balaji warns that without a transition to a new monetary foundation (e.g., Bitcoin), the West faces a systemic collapse.
Quote
00:53:38“It was the greatest empire of all time.” — Balaji Srinivasan
Quote
00:53:49“The empire lasted 85 years.” — Balaji Srinivasan
⚙ Agent-readable JSON index — click to expand
{ "memcast_version": "0.1", "episode": { "id": "VSVOQl-vFKk", "title": "Balaji Srinivasan: The COLLAPSE of the West – Why AI, Bitcoin & China Will Win | Peter McCormack", "podcast": "The Peter McCormack Show", "guest": "Balaji Srinivasan", "host": "Peter McCormack", "source_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSVOQl-vFKk", "duration_minutes": 138 }, "concepts": [ { "id": "the-global-economic-center-shifts-eastward", "title": "The Global Economic Center Shifts Eastward", "tags": [ "asia-rise" ] }, { "id": "the-post-war-institutional-order-is-obsolete", "title": "The Post-War Institutional Order Is Obsolete", "tags": [ "global-governance" ] }, { "id": "four-party-conflict-red-america-blue-america-china-internet", "title": "Four-Party Conflict: Red America, Blue America, China, Internet", "tags": [ "china", "internet" ] }, { "id": "bitcoin-as-the-core-of-a-new-monetary-system", "title": "Bitcoin as the Core of a New Monetary System", "tags": [ "bitcoin" ] }, { "id": "dollar-inflation-as-global-taxation-and-its-unsustainability", "title": "Dollar Inflation as Global Taxation and Its Unsustainability", "tags": [ "global-governance", "dollar-inflation" ] }, { "id": "tariffs-and-industrial-policy-are-ineffective-without-supply-chain-insight", "title": "Tariffs and Industrial Policy Are Ineffective Without Supply-Chain Insight", "tags": [ "logistics", "manufacturing", "tariffs" ] }, { "id": "australia-and-new-zealand-under-recognized-winners", "title": "Australia and New Zealand: Under-Recognized Winners", "tags": [ "economic-resilience" ] }, { "id": "education-shifts-to-internet-first-apprenticeships", "title": "Education Shifts to Internet-First Apprenticeships", "tags": [ "ai-alignment", "education", "internet" ] }, { "id": "network-states-the-future-of-governance", "title": "Network States: The Future of Governance", "tags": [ "global-governance", "domestic‑talent", "network-state", "blockchain-infrastructure" ] }, { "id": "the-collapse-of-the-west-mirrors-the-ussr", "title": "The Collapse of the West Mirrors the USSR", "tags": [ "west‑collapse" ] } ] }