MemCast
MemCast / episode / insight
#criminal-defense2#legal-ethics2#professional-integrity1
Lawyers refuse to tamper with witnesses or evidence, adhering to professional ethics despite client pressure
  • Top lawyers like Tanveer Mir refuse to instruct witnesses to alter testimonies, even when pressured by clients. The Bar Council of India mandates ethical conduct, including not tampering with evidence or witnesses. In the Priya Darshini case, Mir faced threats but refused to back down, emphasizing his duty to the court. Lawyers' credibility depends on maintaining integrity; violating ethics risks disbarment. The profession's reputation hinges on upholding these boundaries, even in high-stakes cases. This ethical stance is crucial for preserving the justice system's legitimacy. Without it, the legal profession would lose public trust and become indistinguishable from political operatives.
Tanveer Ahmed MirRaj Shamani02:44:35

Supporting quotes

Quote
02:44:35
“मैं नहीं करता टाइम ब्रिंग नहीं करोगे यह मैं नहीं करूंगा मैं अपने क्लाइंट को जरूर यह बताऊंगा कि साहब आपके केस में यह पांच छ गवाह जो है यह अहमियत रखते हैं” — Tanveer Ahmed Mir
Quote
02:45:32
“मैं अपने क्लाइंट के लिए कोई पेनिट्रेशन नहीं करूंगा मैं जिंदगी में शुरू से आज तक कभी पुलिस थाने नहीं गया” — Tanveer Ahmed Mir

From this concept

ethical-boundaries-for-lawyers

Top lawyers adhere to strict ethical boundaries, refusing to tamper with witnesses or evidence despite client pressure. This integrity is crucial for preserving the justice system's legitimacy.

View full episode →

Similar insights

“Defense lawyers are constitutionally obligated to defend clients regardless of guilt to uphold the justice system's integrity”

Tanveer Ahmed MirRaj Shamani

“Society's trust in justice depends on lawyers defending even the most heinous criminals”

Tanveer Ahmed MirRaj Shamani

“Lawyers' ethical duty transcends personal morality and serves systemic fairness”

Tanveer Ahmed MirRaj Shamani