MemCast
MemCast / episode / insight
Hyperlid was the first DEX to match centralized exchange performance, and Lighter aims to surpass it.
  • Hyperlid demonstrated that a decentralized order‑book could achieve latency and throughput comparable to a traditional broker.
  • Vlad notes that Lighter’s architecture is even more advanced, targeting superior speed and cost.
  • The implication is that once a DEX can truly compete on performance, all exchanges—centralized and decentralized—will fight for the same market share.
  • This sets the stage for a more level playing field across the entire crypto trading ecosystem.
Vladimir NovakovskiEmpire00:00:00

Supporting quotes

Hyperlid was probably the first one that actually was competitive with centralized exchanges. Vladimir Novakovski
I think lighter is even more so. Vladimir Novakovski

From this concept

Decentralized vs Centralized Exchange Competition

Lighter believes the next frontier is a true convergence where decentralized exchanges can match or exceed the performance of centralized venues, forcing both to vie for the same pool of traders. The legacy dominance of centralized rails still limits DeFi's impact, and recent crises have shown that traders still gravitate toward familiar centralized platforms.

View full episode →

Similar insights